← Home
// CURATION

Curation criteria.

Gnosis Forge is a curated funding portal — not a marketplace. Every submission is reviewed by domain experts before it's listed. This page is the explicit rubric. If your project meets these criteria you have a real shot. If it doesn't, we tell you why and how to fix it.

~3%
Acceptance rate
7 days
Review turnaround
100%
Reviewers with domain experience

What we look for

Every submission is scored against five dimensions. A passing score in all five is required for listing. A category score of 4/10 or lower on any single dimension is an automatic rejection regardless of other scores.

Novelty≥ 7/10

Genuinely new — not another iteration of a category winner. Patent-adjacent, novel primary research, or a structural change to how a problem is solved. Phone cases, smart water bottles, and 12th-generation e-scooters do not qualify.

Technical viability≥ 6/10

Working prototype, published research, or a credible path from bench to product within 18 months. Vaporware and 'we just need funding to start' pitches are rejected.

Impact≥ 6/10

If successful, materially improves a domain — climate, health, security, access to capital, foundational infrastructure. Cool ≠ impactful; we optimize for the latter.

Team credibility≥ 6/10

At least one team member has shipped in the domain before, has a track record in academic research, or has verifiable expertise. Solo first-time founders can still qualify with a strong mentor pairing.

Compliance readiness≥ 5/10

Regulatory pathway is understood and appropriate steps have started — FCC/UL for hardware, FDA for medical, ITAR/FAA for aerospace. We won't gatekeep on completed compliance, but you must know what applies.

Categories we accept

  • Hardware — physical products with engineering novelty. Robotics, sensors, wearables, consumer electronics with meaningful IP.
  • Biotech — diagnostics, therapeutics with disclosed FDA classification, synthetic biology, engineered organisms.
  • Energy — generation, storage, transmission, efficiency. Batteries, capacitors, grid infrastructure, distributed generation.
  • Space — launch, satellites, in-space services, ground infrastructure. ITAR compliance required where applicable.
  • Robotics — autonomous systems, industrial robotics, mobility, actuators. Safety certification pathway required.
  • Materials — novel materials science, manufacturing processes, additive manufacturing. Include characterization data.
  • Medicine — medical devices (Class I/II/III with disclosed classification), digital therapeutics, health infrastructure.
  • Compute — novel silicon, non-standard architectures, open-hardware compute, edge AI hardware.

What we won't list

These categories are outside scope even if your project would score well on the rubric. Some are policy, some are payment-processor restrictions, some are compliance risks we don't take on.

The review process

  1. Day 0 — Submission. You submit through /campaigns/submit. We take your name, KYC identity documents, technical description, evidence (data, prototype photos or video, published papers), team bios, target raise amount, and offering type (Reg CF / Reg D / Reg A+ / rewards-only).
  2. Day 1–2 — Screening. A staff reviewer runs baseline checks: identity, bad-actor screening under SEC Rule 503, KYB for corporate entities, and prohibited-category filter.
  3. Day 2–5 — Domain review. Two independent domain reviewers score against the rubric. They can request more evidence once; second-pass reviewer signs off.
  4. Day 5–7 — Decision. Accept, reject with specific feedback, or accept-with-conditions (e.g., "acceptable pending FCC certification path documented"). You receive a written decision on the seventh day at the latest.
  5. Day 8+ — Listing prep. Accepted projects work with an onboarding lead to build the campaign page, prepare Form C/D/1-A filings if applicable, pair with a mentor, and set launch date.

Team requirements

If you're rejected

Every rejection comes with a written explanation identifying which rubric dimension(s) you fell short on and what would need to change for a resubmission to succeed. You can:

Rejection is common. Acceptance is not the goal on day one.
About 97 out of 100 submissions are rejected on first pass. That is by design. If we accepted more, the average quality of the catalog would drop and backers would stop trusting the shelf. Take a rejection as free structured feedback, not as a verdict on the project.
Submit a projectGet a mentor firstAsk a question